|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 5 posts ] |
|
| Author |
Message |
|
elizabeth.mabrey
Expert
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 2:43 pm Posts: 133 Location: New Jersey
|
 HiTechnic vs Mindsensors
Wonder if there are people out there have experienced in the difference between HiTechnic vs Mindsensors, especially on the accelerometer, compass, and IR.
Your input is appreciated.
|
| Wed Feb 04, 2009 8:34 am |
|
 |
|
docilio
Expert
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 10:12 am Posts: 116
|
 Re: HiTechnic vs Mindsensors
I Could add on this "fight" my new site of products for NXT...
[url]NXT4YOU.com[/url]
We are on developing, but already got an digital multiplexer ready to sell.
As soon as the english page is ready, i will post more information
|
| Tue Mar 03, 2009 4:39 pm |
|
 |
|
mohem
Rookie
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:22 pm Posts: 5
|
 Re: HiTechnic vs Mindsensors
Hi
like you I'm wondering about the performance of both types:
from what I read from both website about the accelerometer:
mindsensor : Supported sensitivities: (+/-) 2.5G, 3.3G, 6.7G, 10.0G HiTechnic : measured in the range of –2g to +2g
at least from this I would go for the mindsensor since it has configurable sensitivity.
any thought from usage and performance point of view
ThX
_________________ Artificial Intelligence is no match for Natural Stupidity !!!!
|
| Tue Mar 24, 2009 5:12 pm |
|
 |
|
Jampoz
Rookie
Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2010 12:25 pm Posts: 48 Location: Rome, Italy
|
 Re: HiTechnic vs Mindsensors
I don't know about the Mindsensor one but I own an HT one and it's great, very responsive, gives me really fast readings What I did think about before buying it was that the Mindsensor one was less expensive and looked like it had more features, I was like "there must be something bad hidden in it" and I then got the HT one 
|
| Tue Jan 19, 2010 5:07 am |
|
 |
|
mightor
Moderator
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2008 8:14 am Posts: 2864 Location: Rotterdam, The Netherlands
|
 Re: HiTechnic vs Mindsensors
I own both and they work equally fine. The range feature on the Mindsensors one is a little superfluous since you'd usually put it in the biggest range anyway. Both sensors are supported by the built in drivers. For additional features, you could use the 3rd Party Driver Suite. Regards, Xander
_________________| Some people, when confronted with a problem, think, "I know, I'll use threads," | and then two they hav erpoblesms. (@nedbat)| My Blog: I'd Rather Be Building Robots| ROBOTC 3rd Party Driver Suite: [ Project Page]
|
| Tue Jan 19, 2010 5:19 am |
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 5 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|