Re: alternative to bFloatDuringInactiveMotorPWM needed
I agree that things seem pretty quiet from the developers. I chalk it up to them working on the FTC version (seems I read somewhere that they were busy with that).
I think for RobotC to be a competitive product the developers likely focus on the largest group of users which I suppose is at a more beginning or intermediate programming level. That means more advanced features will take longer to address or may not be addressed at all.